After dinner I returned to the room and looked out the window again (I’m not sure what I was expecting to find the second time!) Again, I looked straight into the office building that was beautifully illuminated for the people who were working there. Unfortunately but not surprisingly, no one was working there at 10pm.
This triggered a very obvious question – why was each floor of this and every other office building in the city lit up all night, every night? The power required for this pointless exercise would be massive, and seems to me to be a very easy way of reducing power consumption and green house gas emissions.
Earlier this year the Sydney Morning Herald and the World Wildlife Fund (I think) teamed up to promote Earth Hour – inviting Sydney-siders to turn off their lights for one hour on 31 March and see how easy it is to take action on global warming.
It’s a good idea, but whilst turning off the lights in your suburban home may not be practicable, turning off the lights in an office building for 12 hours a day, each day of the week is. Let’s pick the low hanging fruit.
- – -
I visited the World Wildlife Fund website but couldn’t find a single reference to the full name of the organisation – each reference was simply written as WWF. This isn’t particularly helpful for the uninitiated, and isn’t best practice for web writing, or any other writing for that matter. WWF may not actually stand for World Wildlife Fund, but I have a recollection from a Year 6 assignment that leads me to believe this is what the acronym represents!)
This post is tagged
2 Comments
The practice of keeping the lights on is a complete joke. even the long term globes in those lights would be ridiculous.
Sydney is a silly place, though the whole world is like that. I dont understand why they cant have half of those lights on? If they need light (who knows why) and if no one is working, then why cant they have at least the lights at half, enough to see, but too dark to work?
I dont get it either.
Mind you, this winter has been so cold where I am, I am beginning to think Al Gore is joking about global warming!!
Just got a response back from WWF:
Thanks for your email, yes our initials do cause some confusion. Originally the Initials did stand for The World Wildlife Fund, this name was then changed in the 80’s as our work came to encompass broader environmental issues to The World Wide Fund for Nature, you can read more about the history of WWF’s name by going to our Global Site http://www.panda.org.au here is the link –
http://www.panda.org./faq/response.cfm?hdnQuestionId=3620012246264
Incoming Links
Leave a Reply